People claim that the Internet has given everyone a voice; a place to express themselves in any way they want to. There is an inherent flaw with this philosophy though. The reason why throughout human history, up until now, only a select few were given a platform in which to express their views and ideals. Much like the yammering of a busy concert hall right before the lights go down, no one distinct person can be heard. I’m sure they’ll all claim they have something important to say, but the truth of the matter is that while that may be true, what they are saying is lost in a sea of droning.
This translates well to the atmosphere of the Internet. With billions and billions of websites and blogs (this one being no different), some may actually have something worthwhile to say, to express. However, despite it’s legitimacy it will be buried and forgotten within the mess. Quantity over quality devalues all ideas down to the lowest common denominator. What you have to say is no more important than the next person’s regardless of legitimacy or validity. So, does this mean that by being so plentiful with content that perhaps the Internet has no content at all? Perhaps by being so saturated with voices, much like the concert hall, it becomes nothing more than a meaningless hum of complacency. Even this post, being no different, will be lost within the mess of anonymity.
At the concert, the only voice that will be heard will be the person on the stage, but only once everyone else shuts up. However, if everyone continues to talk, claiming their opinion carries the same weight or more than the person next to them and no one even bothers to take the time to listen, even the person on the stage will simply be part of the collective droning. As humans we’ve mastered the ability to communicate. What we’ve yet to master is the ability to listen.
